Re: What's Wrong With Crescenta Valley High?

"Jonathan Ball" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 03:06:22 -0400, "Michael Cerkowski
> <mjc1@" <"SLICK>albany.net"> wrote:
>
>
> What's wrong is, there is no scholarship at all.  Slick
> is an animal "rights" passivist who holds an
> uninformed, polemical belief - "hunting is bad" - and
> has worked frantically to try to develop some kind of
> empirical support for the belief.  That alone is
> evidence of zero scholarship:  honest researchers may
> start with expectations of what they will find in the
> course of their research, but they select only the
> empirical "facts" that support their preconceived
> beliefs.  That is what Slick has done.
>
> The other massive flaw in Slick's screed is, there is
> no reference for any of his supposed "facts" about
> deer.  He gives some links to reference materials at
> the end of the screed, but there is no evidence he has
> read any of it.
>
> It's funny that Slick thinks he has a hope of being
> taken seriously, given his laughably obvious pursuit of
> a political agenda.

At least he keeps the same name ~~jonnie~~ or it is ~~george or even
~~bill~~?

You are the biggest liar on 'Usenet' ~~jonnie~~

Nobody takes you seriously ~~jonnie~~

All we take from you is "The Piss"