
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Zakhar" > > http://tinyurl.com/lvo5 > http://tinyurl.com/lvod > http://tinyurl.com/lvoh > http://www.osseoplastics.com/hutches.htm http://www.nal.usda.gov/awic/newsletters/v7n3/7n3fig2a.htm Zakhar, thanks for those > > > > > > > It might be the case that if there is a ban on fish, many people will > > > replace the fish flesh with the flesh of other animals.... > > > > Yes, this is what will happen. Rather than consuming fish, which has > > beneficial fats that help raise LDL and lower LDL, they'll turn to > > livestock like lamb, beef, pork, and poultry. > > This is what may happen. Unless you have evidence to the contrary. > > > > > > if the > > > authorities would be promoting consuming more plant foods, i'd support > it > > > strongly. > > > > Do you take marching orders from authority figures? Why should we care > > what the "authorities" promote? > > > > > Scarey stuff, seen a lot on the state of the oceans and other water we > > > depend upon, and it's shocking that there isn't a gigantic effort to > make > > > things better. > > > > Bullshit. The fishing industry wants sustainability and profits. What > > good is a profit today if there's no chance of one tomorrow? That's why > > the fishing industry is working for sustainable practices. > > Crap. Some fishermen what sustainability. Some what whatever they can get. > > > > > > Though as long as elected officials owe favors to the > > > industry groups who have donated large amounts of money... > > > > Bullshit. Why do you fail to take on AR groups and other anti-business > > PACs who spread around just as campaign funding? Two sides of the story, > > and you're going against the one for jobs, a strong economy, and a > > sustainable future. > > > > > gov't efforts > > > aren't likely to do anything that will reduce profits of the very > industries > > > who are giving them money. > > > > You're naive and ignorant. Money given to campaigns isn't for personal > > use, at least in these United States. You fail to assess *any* blame on > > anti-business PACs, AR groups, and other assorted influence peddlers on > > the other side of the issue, whose ideas often mean fewer jobs, less > > competition, and other economically insane positions. > > > >
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |