
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Michael Cerkowski <mjc1@ albany.net >" <"DESPAM> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > COLLATERAL DEATHS > > Many vegetarians believe that, because they do not eat > meat, no animals die to feed them. Do these animals die to feed them, or is the real hard truth something different to that? The real hard truth is that animals killed in agriculture aren't killed to ensure people can continue eating veg, because other methods can be and are used which doesn't kill any at all. The hard truth is that they are intentionally killed to maximize profits, so to claim they are killed for any other reason is false. > Unfortunately, this is rarely if ever true. The truth is that no animals die to feed me, as you claim. They die to increase the farmer's profits. > Anyone who eats food that is grown > using mechanical plows and harvesting machines must > accept partial responsibility for the large numbers (no > hard figures are available) of animals who die beneath or > within these machines, or who die from pesticide and > chemical fertilizer poisoning. While accepting responsibility for the deaths of these animals caused by farmers, would you also accept responsibility in the same casual manner and continue to buy from producers if it were other rights bearers, namely children, being killed to produce your food, or would your indignation at such mass rights violations morally compel you to find other another source for your food?
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |