
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"usual suspect" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Added afv to the cross-post since I address that group below > > Ray wrote: > >>The only point you proved is that self-confessed "compassionate" sods > >>like yourself are actually the most depraved, malevolent examples of our > >>species. You cannot bring yourself to condemn terrorists, > > > > I condemn terrorists, thus far you have only spoken of ARA freedom fighters. > > Did they liberate any geese from the chef's house? Were any geese kept > beneath the Buddha statue they damaged? Were any geese freed from the > adjacent businesses affected by the water damage? Etc. > > Real freedom fighters accomplish a lot more than destruction of private > property. > > > Nelson Mandela was a self-confessed terrorist - do you condemn him - I > > don't. > > I think Mandela was and is a shallow cause celebre. He still deserves > the pariah status he earned in the 1960s when he advocated armed > resistance. The Left got a lot of traction with Mandela as their poster > boy, when in fact he was one of the dirtiest shits to have been > portrayed as a "political" prisoner. Under that definition, Zacarias > Moussaoui and your own countryman Richard Reid are "political > prisoners." God forbid, some day some misguided assholes will make them > posterboys. > > Back to your point. See Botha, see Mandela. See Apartheid, see ANC. Same > coin, different sides. > > >>this shit -- > > > > Well, I try to answer your messages, so I suppose you are correct - this > > time > > > > you're not much different than they are You have so much > > > >>compassion for animals, and nothing but vitriol for your fellow man. > > > > > > Guess it works the other way around with you - troll > > > > I do not consider scumbags like Ball, yourself and vivisectionists to be > > fellow men. They/you are low class savages. > > You've proven a point I've made to which others, especially at afv, have > taken exception: veganISM isn't so much about diet (I'm politically > correct on that), it's all about the public posture and politics of the > movement. Most of those "open-minded" people at afv have no tolerance > for dissenting political views, much less from someone who shares their > dietary goals. > > Your diet is nebulously vegetarian; mine is vegan. Your posture is > shallow; mine is principled. You talk the talk; I walk the walk. Keep walking - Fuck off. > > <snip> >
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |