
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 16:27:47 +0100, Malcolm Ogilvie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Derek ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >> >>"Jonathan Ball" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Ray wrote: >>> > "Derek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >>> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>"Jonathan Ball" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >>> >>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>>Derek wrote: >>> >>>>"Jonathan Ball" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >>> >>>>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>>>>Derek wrote: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>>>Some of Jon's post now contain an archive script pasted >>> >>>>>>right at the bottom as a sig. Could this be the reason why >>> >>>>>>a lot of my replies to him are rejected by my server with >>> >>>>>>a "line 3 too long" error report? >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>>No. You dummy. >>> >>>> >>> >>>>Why do you secretly add the script, anyway? >>> >>> >>> >>>That question is absurd. >>> > >>> > The question is *not* absurd you lying little virus sending fuckpig. >>> >>> It's absurd. I didn't "secretly" do it. >> >>You have been secretly adding an archive script at >>the bottom of your posts as part of a signature. The >>script isn't well placed for most of us to spot, seeing >>as you tucked it so far down the sig page, so what's >>your problem in having your posts archived, Jon? >> >What on earth are you getting so excited about? Why didn't you check >whether his attempt to prevent archiving of his posts by putting >"x-no-archive: yes" in his signature is actually working *before* >making a great song and dance about it? > >Whatever his motive, he isn't preventing his posts appearing on Google, >which you could have found out for yourself. Perhaps if he realised that >the X-no-Archive line has to either be in the header or the *first* line >of any message, he might achieve what he apparently wants to. Malcolm Ogilvie the CONservation hooligan has allied himself to Jonathan Ball, yet another nefarious partner in crime he has chosen. what do you hope J Ball can do for you Ogilvie? The archives will look good when presented with the posting history of his partner in crime J Ball & M Ogilvie, most interesting reading, if not language. Example. Mr Ogilvie's friend and partner J Ball was asked today his opinion on the RSPB: "The RSPB and Malcolm Ogilvie do an excellent job, dont let these cunthairs who fucking lie saying they are CONservation hooligans, these pissdrippers are just out to spoil a good thing" Well done Ogilvie, another shot in the foot, your name will always be linked with J Ball now.. Bwahahahahahahaha
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |