The Right-Wrong Hologram

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > This is obvious. Hume would have destroyed us all.
> > 
> > Snail
> 
> 
> Gilbert Gerber's reply to Snail:
> 
> Hypothetically speaking:
> 
> Small is small. We can't assume that small is big. We can't assume
> small is narrow either. The beholder intends to denounce something in
> scale. The beholder's ability to denounce anything is subject to text.
> The limitations of text.
> 
> Hume would have destroyed us all and also himself. If there is a point
> to be made, we should pursue that as much as we can, for
> deconstructivism has left us dry.
> 
> We have proven our inability, so what are we capable of?

This links to the religion issue:

Gilbert Gerber's view on religion. 

Is religion necessary? The question is whether we as necessary? 

Suppose there is a God, would the decision lay with us on whether
religion is necessary? How can religion be necessary without a God? A
social structure or system is necessary and if there is a God,
religion would be of the essence to our existence.

And I believe religion is necessary.