
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
> This is obvious. Hume would have destroyed us all. > > Snail Gilbert Gerber's reply to Snail: Hypothetically speaking: Small is small. We can't assume that small is big. We can't assume small is narrow either. The beholder intends to denounce something in scale. The beholder's ability to denounce anything is subject to text. The limitations of text. Hume would have destroyed us all and also himself. If there is a point to be made, we should pursue that as much as we can, for deconstructivism has left us dry. We have proven our inability, so what are we capable of?
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |