
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Gilbert Gerber rephrases his previous comment: > > It is sometimes necessary to state the obvious and to re-evaluate what > we accept. > > Right is right and wrong is wrong. Whether we know the difference is > another issue. That's like saying big is big and small is small. Both are relative concepts and the "difference" is in the eye of the beholder. >The only point I will make for now is that our > inability to distinguish between right and wrong doesn't nullify it's > existence nor it's relevance". If someone cannot distinguish between right and wrong then in a sense they don't exist for that person. <snip> > "…our inability to distinguish between right and wrong doesn't nullify > the existence nor it's relevance." > The ultimate truth of all things is something much greater than us > and our ability to prove it. Would the truth have pended on our > ability to prove it, we would have been in trouble. This is obvious. Hume would have destroyed us all. Snail
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |