Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Talk Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: The Right-Wrong Hologram



[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote in 
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> Gilbert Gerber rephrases his previous comment:
>  
> It is sometimes necessary to state the obvious and to re-evaluate what
> we accept.
> 
> Right is right and wrong is wrong. Whether we know the difference is
> another issue. 

That's like saying big is big and small is small. Both are relative 
concepts and the "difference" is in the eye of the beholder.

>The only point I will make for now is that our
> inability to distinguish between right and wrong doesn't nullify it's
> existence nor it's relevance".

If someone cannot distinguish between right and wrong then in a sense they 
don't exist for that person.
 
<snip>
> "…our inability to distinguish between right and wrong doesn't nullify
> the existence nor it's relevance."
> The ultimate truth of all things is something  much greater than us
> and our ability to prove it. Would the truth have pended on our
> ability to prove it, we would have been in trouble.

This is obvious. Hume would have destroyed us all.

Snail




<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.