Re: The God Spots in the Brain

Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in alt.atheism

> Elroy Willis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in alt.atheism

<snip>

>>> I fail to see how "neurotheology" (ROFLOL) will help anyone;
>>> except theists who realize that there dogma is ineffective and who
>>> attempt to use scientific means to justify their beliefs.

>> How do you think they could use it to justify their beliefs, exactly?

> Sunday school failed in its attempt to brainwash the masses;

In actuality, it seems to have done a pretty good job here in the
USA... At least the part of it I live in.

> let's see if "science" will work instead.

Do you think Persinger is a religious man for some reason?  From what
I've read, I don't surmise that he is.

> I believe that neurotheology is akin to "creation science". ie. the use of
> pseudo-scientific nonsense to justify a pre-excepted belief (God). Assume
> God and then use "science" to "prove" it.

I don't get that impression from most of the neurotheologists I've
read about.  They say some things that are obviously intended to quell
the fears of some religious people like "We're not out to disprove
God," or something like that, but that doesn't mean that they actually
are trying to support the idea of some external god which exists
outside the brains of the believers.

>>> Neuroscience and brain surgery help people; neurotheology is proof that
>>> religion is scrambling to justify itself. Why waste time on a dying dog?

>> I actually foresee the god helmet that Persinger uses being simplified
>> and the components miniaturized and made available to the consumer
>> to use in the privacy of their homes, as a meditation aid, or as a way
>> to relax or get high without any drugs.

>> Whether that's a good thing or a bad thing, I don't know, but it would
>> probably threaten the churches if people could get high on god without
>> going to church.  The government would probably get involved as well,
>> maybe even the FDA, who knows?  I actually wonder what department of
>> the government might try to intervene in such a case. The helmet
>> wouldn't really be a food or a drug, so maybe it's out of their
>> bounds?  Hmm...

> I wonder if these neurotheologists have researched non-religious persons?

What do you mean by researched?

Would you be willing to try a god helmet?  If not, why not?

I'm pretty sure I'd try one if they sent me one for free and were
interested in my feedback.  If I had to buy one to try it out, it
might be a different story.  If I tried it and I liked it, I might buy
it as well...

You can actually buy one now, at:

http://www.innerworlds.50megs.com/shakti_lite/

The warnings are interesting...

"Use at your own Risk.     
Use with care.     
Use only the suggested session designs.     
Do Not Use If You Have a History of Epilepsy, migraine headaches, or
Psychiatric Disorders, or if you have a damaged or compromised Brain.
Do not use if you are taking psychiatric medications.     
If you are ambidextrous, you will need to work within some
limitations. Click HERE to learn about them     
Do not use if you do not understand English.     
Do not use if you are less than 18 years of age."

> It does not surprise me that someone who has faith in prayer can experience
> euphoria or whatever when they prey.

Many people can't experience that when they're all alone.  They need a
group of people gathered together, all praying together, with some
preacher up on stage, yapping away about their god, or some central
point of focus that they all pray to.  It's a form of mass mind
control and hypnosis in a way.  Doing it five times a day instead of
once or twice a week seems to be most effective in the case of Islam.

Funny how many Christians flat out ignore what Jesus said about
praying in public.  He said to go into your room or closet and close
the door and pray all alone, like he did when he went off on his own
to pray many times, away from his disciples or followers.

> A healthy mind, I believe, promotes a healthy body and vice versa. However,
> none believers can have positive attitudes too. I believe this is the crux. Positive
> attitude, prayer, hope, huge ego - there all the same thing, but be assured that
> no neurotheologist quack will admit to this.

I think you might have the wrong impression of the neurotheologists
out there.  You seem to think they're trying to prove that some god
really exists or something.

> They'll preach the power of prayer and stick to it like a fly on you know
> what. The God spot - ha ha ha ha ha.

If they were smart, they'd market the god helmet to get rid of prayer,
if prayers are what really relax the religious people out there.

"Why go to church to get your weekly god fix when you can do it
from the comfort of your couch?"

-- 
Elroy Willis
EAP Chief Editor and Newshound
http://web2.airmail.net/~elo/news