
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
The only plausible defence to the problem of evil is the 'free will defence', ie. that the good of having free will outweighs any evil in the world. This is difficult to argue against since it seem like a matter of opinion: does the gift of free will outweigh evil? Then, the one possible answer to the free will defence is the suggestion that God should segregate evil people into a secluded region for themselves, thereby protecting non-evil people. Again, this is going to be a matter of opinion. In one sense, this will be constraint on free will: what if I want to go to this secluded place for fun? But maybe it is a necessary contraint in order to minimize evil. Who knows? This is where the debate stalemates. So there you have it: problem of evil -> free will defence. There isn't much else to it folks...
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |