Re: Moral corruption - the blight of "animal 'rights' activists"

Dipsey Dreckshit wrote:

> On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 17:59:02 GMT, Bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Dipsey Dreckshit wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 17:17:16 GMT, Bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > You approve of them:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I said I didn't.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > You lied.  You do approve:  you buy from those who use the method.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > And once again, Jonnie/Bill refuses to address what his opponents
> > > > > > > > > > > really believe by claiming to know what they believe better than
> > > > > > > > > > > they do themselves.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > No.  That's not it, and you know it.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > You just did it again.
> > > > >
> > > > > As is plainly seen, you keep insisting Karen believes 
> > > > > something she says she doesn't,
> > > >
> > > > Right.  
> > >
> > > Well, I've got news for you, because basing your argument
> > > on supposed mind-reading capabilities
> >
> > It isn't...and you know it. I've told you, and demonstrated 
> > for you, that it's based on observation of visible behavior.
>
> See! You're doing it again: pretending to know what your
> opponent believes better than they do themselves.

No.  You just don't get it.

No mindreading required, Dipsey Dreckshit.  I have keen 
powers of observation.

Fuck off, Dreck.