Re: Moral corruption - the blight of "animal 'rights' activists"

Dipsey Dreckshit wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 16:47:24 GMT, Jonathan Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Dipsey Dreckshit wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 22:47:13 GMT, usual suspect <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Ipse DRECK wrote:
> > > > <...>
> > > >
> > > > > > , which are true accidents we 
> > > > > > strive mightily and at great expense to prevent, and 
> > > > > > the collateral deaths of animals, which are ignored by 
> > > > > > everyone, or the intentional deaths of vermin animals, 
> > > > > > which are deliberately caused and of which Karen and 
> > > > > > you, Dreck, approve as evidenced by your continued, 
> > > > > > fully aware purchases.
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't see any causal link between my trade with
> > > > > him and the method he uses to satisfy my demand.
> > > > > It doesn't instruct him to farm one way or the other.
> > > > > Those options are his, and he, being completely
> > > > > autonomous is responsible for his actions. I blame him
> > > > > on the basis that he is a morally responsible agent
> > > > > carrying obligations to endure the consequences of 
> > > > > his actions.
> > > >
> > > > You remain a very indiscriminate consumer. 
> > >
> > > Unsupported speculation and false. 
> >
> > No, Dipsey Dreckshit; supported, and irrefutable.
>
>
> He or you know nothing about the food I buy or from
> whom I buy it,

We do know.  You've discussed it in the past, Dreckshit.

It wouldn't have mattered if you'd said a word.  We 
would know, anyway.