www.Usenet.com
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 14:16:42 -0800, "Dutch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"DipShit DreckShit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 21:33:21 GMT, Bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rat & Swan wrote:
Bill wrote:
Rat & Swan wrote:
I said that there would be no need to kill them if the caretakers of the grain used appropriate alternate methods.
They use appropriate methods.
I said killing the rodents is not an appropriate method.
You lied. You do think it's an appropriate method: that's why you buy from those who employ that method.
You approve of them:
I said I didn't.
You lied. You do approve: you buy from those who use the method.
And once again, Jonnie/Bill refuses to address what his opponents really believe by claiming to know what they believe better than they do themselves.
No. That's not it, and you know it.
You just did it again.
You claim to believe something, and I show that your behavior indicates you don't believe it. No mind reading required.
You claim you don't approve of killing animals at grain elevators, but you prove that you DO approve of it, by buying grain products in the full knowledge of the extermination of rodents at grain elevators.
That line of reasoning is absurd for the simple reason that no one is said to approve of the deaths of humans in industry simply because they continue to buy products from that industry.
There are no industries which support sanctioned, systematic, deliberate, and controlled killing of humans.
Who ever said that animal collateral deaths are sanctioned,
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
