Re: Moral corruption - the blight of "animal 'rights' activists"

On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 21:33:21 GMT, Bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Rat & Swan wrote:
>> Bill wrote:
>>> Rat & Swan wrote:
>> 
>>>>>>   I said that there would be no need to kill them if the caretakers
>>>>>>   of the grain used appropriate alternate methods.
>> 
>>>>> They use appropriate methods. 
>> 
>>>>  I said killing the rodents is not an appropriate method.
>> 
>>> You lied.  You do think it's an appropriate method: 
>>> that's why you buy from those who employ that method. 
>>> 
>>>>>You approve of them:
>> 
>>>>   I said I didn't.
>> 
>>> You lied.  You do approve:  you buy from those who use the method.
>> 
>> And once again, Jonnie/Bill refuses to address what his opponents
>> really believe by claiming to know what they believe better than
>> they do themselves.
>
>No.  That's not it, and you know it.

You just did it again.
>
>You claim to believe something, and I show that your 
>behavior indicates you don't believe it.  No mind 
>reading required.
>
>You claim you don't approve of killing animals at grain 
>elevators, but you prove that you DO approve of it, by 
>buying grain products in the full knowledge of the 
>extermination of rodents at grain elevators.  

That line of reasoning is absurd for the simple reason
that no one is said to approve of the deaths of humans 
in industry simply because they continue to buy products
from that industry. 

>We don't 
>listen to your insincere words of what you believe

We don't listen to your sloppy thinking on blame and
moral responsibility, either.