
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"David V." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Daniel T. wrote: > > > There is reason to punish a woman for taking away the > > ability of a man to raise his child though... > > As soon as you can take the fetus out of the woman and > implant it in the man you can say that. Until then, you have > no case. I don't agree. As an analogy, let's say there is a river that begins at a spring that is in my property and then runs through yours. There are limits on what I can do to that river based on how it may harm you. If I decided to dump poison into it thus killing your land would you really accept me saying "I can do whatever I want to the water that runs through *my* property?" I don't think so. It's the same with the fetus/child. It belongs to both the man and woman, just because it begins in the woman's body doesn't give her the right to do whatever ever she wants regardless of the man's desire.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |