
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
David V. wrote:
Chris wrote:
"David V." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Marie A. wrote:
... When we don't execute those who have willfully and premeditatedly taken the life of another, as a society we make a statement that we value the murderer's life more than that of his/her victim[s].
Which simply is not true. Why do you have to lie like that to support your argument?
Care to explain to us how a belief in ideals can be a "lie"?
Huh? Where did "ideals" come in anywhere?
The ideal she spoke of is apparent. She values the victims life more than she does that of the person who terminates that life.
Then she wouldn't value the life of the person that carries out the punishment?
He mistake is in believing that when we reject the death penalty that we are making a statement as she explained very clearly and concisely.
That is the lie I'm talking about. "We" are not making such a statement.
That you can't see that makes manifest that you can't recognize principles and ideals. I'm having a bit of difficulty in keeping track of the things you are making known about yourself. Let's see, so far you're an unprincipled, ignorant, habitual liar.
I understand how you need to feel that way. -- David V. Yosemite Llama Ranch
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |