my messages for critique

I am claiming to be similar to past religious figures but am
attempting to explain my unique patterns of inspiration
at least partly by science.   Moreover I figured I can't
just say out of the blue (even with said patterns and
certain unique experiences) that I am e.g. like Taliesin
but must have some at least partly new/for the day
type of messages. 

So for now on my web page I am pushing certain 
non-denominational main messages but not the details
of my evolving personal (and I am not recruiting) spiritual 
path.   I hope that at least 75% of my main messages are 
acceptable as is to atheists, agnostics and humanists on 
here, but in any case my main purpose in posting here was 
to ask you to look at said messages and say either
on here or by e-mail to my off-campus address in the
header (which I read on Saturdays) or both which
messages you disagree with, whether any other need
editing for clarity, and whether there are any
significant ones you think might be missing (which
I would reference to you if I added them unless
you preferred not).

Said messages are on
http://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html
and its subpages
http://www.nfld.com/~dalton/un.html
and
http://www.nfld.com/~dalton/extinction.html   
which can be clicked on from the first one.

Now I suspect the points of differing will mainly be:
1. the Extinction Reel one (though I now say I no longer
firmy believe in that but say it could be true) and
2. the one saying that past pagan and non-pagan religious
figures were similar and that I am similar to them and 
3. maybe some will say there is neither an all-powerful
nor a perfectly good someone (whereas the related message is 
that there cannot be one someone that is BOTH all-powerful
AND perfectly good)

I could dump all those plain text pages in here but 
they are pretty easy to click on and I would gain
some by dumping them in here and lose others.  But
anyway I would love some editorial comments if you
have five minutes to spare.   

David
http://www.nfld.com/~dalton