Re: Abortion

"David V." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Perhaps you'd be good enough to explain just what isn't
> > true.
>
> Trying to explain something like that to someone like you
> would be a waste of time. You already know your statement
> was false, yet you persist.

When you go calling someone a liar, and that someone dares you to prove them
a liar, and you subsequently pull a chump-ass excuse such as the above, it
makes you appear to be less than stable.

Back up your statements with honesty, or go the fuck home, bunky.

> > Your post implies first that American girls aren't
> > getting abortions
>
> There is no such implication, but you already knew that.

How in the hell would anyone other than you know what you imply in your
statements?

> > You're the one who stated thatthere are not enough
> > children available in this country to meet the demand for
> > adoption.
>
> No I didn't, but you already knew that.

If you really didn't, why bother defending what someone could clearly read,
or not read, for themselves?

> > Non-repsonsive aren't you?
>
> No, you just don't like my responses.

Again, the commentary we'd expect of a child.

> > The U.S. mrder rate is lower than at any time since the
> > death penalty was banned.
>
> Sure, but take the rest of society into consideration and
> the connection disapears.

Take what exactly into consideration?  Be more specific if you expect us to
take you seriously.