
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Mjkenoyer wrote:It's not so much what is going on inside her body. It's what she's doing to someone elses body. We condone killing people for three reasons in this society. Self defense, war and the death penalty. If a womans continued physical existence is threatened by the pregnancy, fine, abortion is, under those circumstances, self defense. But we do not condone the destruction of a human life for convenience sake. Euthenasia is the logical next step. Why not? They can't kill you by defending themselves. They'd be easy prey also.
See this is what continues to bewilder me about the pro-choice argument....
What's so bewildering about a woman controlling what goes on inside her own body?
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |