
www.Usenet.com
Group Index
Talk Thread Archive from Usenet.com
Re: Politics and morality
- __From__: Ron Peterson
- __Subject__: Re: Politics and morality
- __Date__: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 02:49:40 -0600
Marvin Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Ron Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> That's not what "sacred" means. <
> One of its meanings is simply "entitled to reverence and respect". It's
> synonym group is "sacred, sacrosanct, inviolate, inviolable - shared meaning
> element: protected (as by law, custom, or human respect) against abuse".
> (Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary, 1979). You can be a humanist and still
> hold certain things sacred, for exampe, the worth and dignity of every
> person.
Technically correct, but your effort to force religious attributes on
humanists is misguided resulting in silly side arguments to serious
issues.
--
Ron
- Re: Politics and morality, (continued)
- Re: Politics and morality,
ralph
- Re: Politics and morality,
Ron Peterson
- Re: Politics and morality,
Marvin Edwards
- Re: Politics and morality,
Ron Peterson
- Re: Politics and morality,
Lucien Saumur
- Re: Politics and morality,
David V.
- Re: Politics and morality,
Ron Peterson
- Re: Politics and morality,
Lucien Saumur
- Re: Politics and morality,
Marvin Edwards
- Re: Politics and morality,
ralph
- Re: Politics and morality,
Ron Peterson
- Re: Politics and morality,
Marvin Edwards
- Re: Politics and morality,
David V.
- Re: Politics and morality,
Marvin Edwards
- Re: Politics and morality,
David V.
- Re: Politics and morality,
Marvin Edwards
- Re: Politics and morality,
David V.
- Re: Politics and morality,
Marvin Edwards
- Re: Politics and morality,
David V.
- Re: Politics and morality,
Marvin Edwards
- Re: Politics and morality,
David V.