
www.Usenet.com
Group Index
Talk Thread Archive from Usenet.com
Re: Evidence of God
- __From__: 386sx
- __Subject__: Re: Evidence of God
- __Date__: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 14:40:47 -0600
Al Evan writes:
> I never argued that there are 'gods.'
The real issue here, for you, is, when did they argue that there are no
gods?
Or, as one of your "wiser" USENET apologist compadres once proclaimed,
"No true atheist claims that there is no god. :-)"
--
"If an opponent rebuts a claim of irrelevance, the other party must reply to
the opponent's rebuttal of the claim." -- J.F. Till
- Re: Evidence of God, (continued)
- Re: Evidence of God,
AngryJohn
- Re: Evidence of God,
stoney
- Re: Evidence of God,
stoney
- Re: Evidence of God,
Libertarius
- Re: Evidence of God,
Orhan Orgun
- Re: Evidence of God,
ad
- Re: Evidence of God,
whysohard
- Re: Evidence of God,
tonyofbexarremovethis
- Re: Evidence of God,
Al Klein
- Re: Evidence of God,
Al Evan
- Re: Evidence of God,
386sx
- Re: Evidence of God,
Christopher A . Lee
- Re: Evidence of God,
Al Evan
- Re: Evidence of God,
stoney
- Re: Evidence of God,
stoney
- Re: Evidence of God,
stoney
- Re: Evidence of God,
stoney
Re: Evidences of God,
Chain Smoker