
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Lucien Saumur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The role of the humanist is *logically* to help people, as I have explained. That's what humanitarians try to do. > Why are humanists necessary? What purpose could they possibly serve? I think that the purpose of humanism is to enable communication with others on social issues with a minimal set of beliefs (in science and reason). I don't think anybody invented humanists for a purpose. > Why can't people not simply just live their lives without religion? > Many do. Many have difficulty coping with life without some sort of spiritual support. > But some need to be reassured that they are doing the right thing. > If no one needed to be reassured, then there would be no need for > humanists. Humanists aren't created because there is a need for them. People become humanists because they want to communicate with others. -- Ron
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |