Re: Comments

In talk.origins  I read this message from "Pat"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

>You evolutionists are generally very well educated, and the creationists in
>contrast don't seem that well educated. It reminds me of very clever lawyers
>in a court that can make anything seem plausible. Just because you seem to
>win the arguments against people who are not educated enough to argue back
>does not make you right.

This is not a rhetorical game. Your point seems to be that the
people who actually know something about the topic actually win
the arguments. That suggests to me that they are right. If you
see "clever" lawyers win legal arguments against ignorant
challenges, who has the right legal argument?

>I've only done a biology 'O' level and read a bit about evolution, so I
>can't really understand your more technical claims. But, it seems obvious to
>me that you are generally a community that basically shares a common
>ideology,

Ideology? Such as?

> that goes beyond the arena of scientific understanding into the
>area of philosophy, eg, I bet most of you subscribe to a materialistic,
>reductionist model of the human being.

I bet you are wrong.