Re: For gen2rev. California Civil Code 1719(relaitng to bad checks)

On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 05:30:28 +0000 (UTC), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (J McCoy)
wrote:

>raven1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>> On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 06:07:02 +0000 (UTC), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (J McCoy)
>> wrote:
>> 
>> >AC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>> >> On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 23:25:27 +0000 (UTC), 
>> >> J McCoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> 
>> >Actually, Aaron Claussen,  I'm  tired of your despicable behavior of
>> >trying to coerce me into paying on a debt that I DO NOT OWE.
>> 
>> 
>> Then why did you admit that you do, McLiar?
>> 
>> http://groups.google.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
>> "No gen2rev.  I owe money to gen2rev so that's what I wrote the check
>> out to. So where's your address gen2rev? IT is NOT A LIE."
>> 
>> 
>> >
>> >Please apologize for your slander.
>> 
>> You mean "libel", not "slander", McDumbass,
>
>Getting nasty here?  Such anger, 

There's no anger involved, just an observation that as usual, you're
apparently incapable of correcting yourself even when multiple people
have pointed out not only that you're in error, but exactly *why*
you're wrong. The words "libel" and "slander" are *not*
interchangeable, and your continuing to use the latter in place of the
former seems to be almost willful ignorance at this point.


>perhaps the result of my capable
>refutation. 

You really live in a fantasy world, John. Absolutely no one takes your
"refutation" remotely seriously; if you think otherwise, you're only
deluding yourself. Of course, that would be nothing new.

> But let me restate the facts.

Yes, let's restate the facts: gen2rev accepted your bet that was
initially offered to Dana Tweedy, you went so far as to ask him twice
if he wanted to go through with it, you acknowledged that you lost,
and even went so far as to send him a check, albeit an uncashable one.
You then insisted numerous times that you would send him another check
when the first one was returned. Furthermore, you have publicly
admitted that you owe gen2rev $150; it's quoted right above IN YOUR
OWN WORDS, with a Google citation. For you to claim at this late date
that you never even had a bet with gen2rev, or that you don't owe him
for it is dishonesty on a scale that boggles the mind, even coming
from a creationist. What a sad, pathetic creature you are.



---

ROT-13 on Email to reply.