Re: Evolution as a scientific theory

"J McCoy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Can you test evolution?  I mean evolution as the transformation of
> living entities of a primordial type, to a more sophisticated sort
> over the span of millions of years.  For example, at one time
> evolutionists claim that monkeys ruled the world.  This would be apes,
> gibbons, monkeys or whatever current terms are available.  After
> awhile, some of these monkeys began to stand erect.  Some of them
> started to talk in a sign language.  They started out as hunters and
> gatherers, but finally began to cultivate crops and hence civiliation
> began, in the form of homo sapiens.
>
> The problem is, everyone has a different interpretation of bones.  No
> one is quite sure what all the bone specimens mean.  Conjecture is
> involved when scientists try to reconstruct the bones.  The problem
> becomes acute when scientists try to put the bones together.  One bone
> doesn't mean it belongs to another bone or set of bones.
>
> Additionally, emotionalism is involved in interpreting the bones.
> Many evolutionists are deeply emotional about their beliefs and want
> to ensure that everyone believes as they do.
>
> Emotionalism means the use of highly charged words, such as "liar,"
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and others.
>
> Do a word search at google newsgroups on the following evolutionists
> on these groups and discover their use of emotional words such as
> "liar" and "%^%$#".
>
> Dana Tweedy
> Aaron Clausen
> Gen2rev
> Raven1
> Fill blank here_____________________________
>
>
> You will find that emotionalism and hostility pervade the language
> that they use.  This is emotionalism.
>
> Emotion has a way of distorting reality, in making one think that
> something is true when it is not.  So views may be highly subjective.
> True, just because one uses emotions doesn't mean one is wrong.  It
> just shows that even evolutionists have emotions and err too. They err
> all the time, and casually do so.
>
> Emotion had to do with the Piltdown Hoax, and even with a pig's tooth
> as being thought to belong to an ancestor of mankind.  Evolutionists
> even draw monkey heads perched awkwardly atop human bodies all the
> time. This is emotionalism and has only subjective backing behind
> these drawings.
>
> True, evolutionists need to abandon extreme emotionalism and obey the
> truth.  The rest of the world knows what they are up to, and that
> fraudulent construction should be abandoned.

Hmm, intelligent individual and excellent observations.  All the responses
to this so far proves him right!