
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Seppo Pietikainen wrote:
> PeteM wrote:
>
>>John C. Randolph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
>>>Matt Giwer wrote:
>>>> As you claim to have read the trial transcripts, why not simply cut and
>>>
>>>paste the
>>>>physical evidence here?
>>>
>>>Because it's not my job to humor the wilfully ignorant.
>>It isn't reasonable to tell him to "go and look up the trial
>>transcripts". You have not told him how to find them and where in them
>>to look.
>>
>>If you know of specific material in the Irving trial that would help
>>move the discussion on, then cite it. If not, then don't expect anyone
>>to pay any attention to your claim.
> I agree with jcr.
>
> I seem to remeber that Giwer-slimeball has been given ample pointers
> several times before.
Nothing which goes beyond the creationist pointing you to the complexity of
nature to
show you the error of your evolutionist ways.
Why are the rules different when you are in the creationist seat?
--
If Israelis are innocent victims so was General Custer.
-- The Iron Webmaster, 2948
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |