Re: POTM: Re: Random mutation, selection and low probabilities

"R. Dunno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 

> On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 05:42:54 +0000 (UTC), Harlequin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote: 
>> Mark VandeWettering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in 
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> 
>>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Glenn
>>> Morton wrote:
>>> 
>>>> The recent discussion with Walter got me to thinking about a
>>>> process we use in Geophysics and while I was driving home from
>>>> Thanksgiving, I mentally calculated the number of possible
>>>> acoustical impedance models one gets in geophysics. So I wrote it
>>>> up 
>>> 
>>> [ snipped for brevity ]
>>> 
>>> Excellent and informative post Glenn.
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> Seconded.
>> 
> 
> None of the replies in this thread show up at google and he posted
> via google. He may not know that its been nominated.

I am sure they did show up in Google.  Google creates a new thread when
the subject is in any way altered.  Thus if you just look at a Google
thread, you will have no idea of other replies exist.  


-- 
Anti-spam: replace "usenet" with "harlequin2"

"...Everybody has opinions: I have them, you have them. And we are all 
told from the moment we open our eyes, that everyone is entitled to 
his or her opinion. Well, that's horsepuckey, of course. We are not 
entitled to our opinions; we are entitled to our _informed_ opinions. 
Without research, without background, without understanding, it's 
nothing. It's just bibble-babble...."
            - Harlan Ellison