
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 04:57:51 +0000 (UTC), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nowhere Man) did some sarious thank'n and scribbled: >This is a common mistake that people who believe in evolution make so >do not feel bad about it. You ask what would stop these helpful >mutations from happening. Your argument is weak if not false. Most mammals have a number of mechanisms with promote the mutation process. For one the DNA polymerases are less than perfect and make mistakes, more-so in humans than other species that have almost perfect fidelity in replication. Therefore there is not perfect selection on polymerase fidelity. Secondarily there is a very active and rapid process for recombining mutations into new variants. Read Parham and Ohta, Science 1996 or Watkins. Critical Reviews in Immunology 1995. The mammalian replicative process is not entirely passive with regard to creating mutations, without considering gene conversion as discussed by Parham and Ohta, simply consider that each generation there are approximately 2 recombination events on each chromosome for a total of 90 recombination events per generation per individual. >The real question is not what would stop >them but what would cause them. If you stopped them within a few hundred thousand years the species would probably die off. Recombination keeps the population healthy by having certain individuals with multiple disgenic traits that perish or are unlikely to reproduce favoring individuals with the best combinations. > If you want to claim that mutations >can cause new features than you have to find evidence for your claim. Right, gene conversion in south america The appearance of approximately 30 new HLA B and C phenotypes over the last 15,000 years that are both functionally different and resulting from recombination. These new allelotypes are most likely the result of constrictions in the earliest immigrants couple with disease selection in south america. The frequency and abundance of new haplotypes relative to the founding populations in northwestern pacific suggest that selection changed as people migrated and that this positively selected for nascent DNA allelotypes in south america. As a result one should conclude that at some loci 15,000 years is a sufficient time for rapid evolution of positively selective traits. See references above. >I personally suggest that you save some your time because I have >looked myself and there has never been a benificial mutation that has >been observed. Mutations only do harm. There is evidence for that. If >you want to say they can cause new constructions then you need to >provide some evidence for that. See above, you don't know what you are looking for. >Yes I agreed that there is change is all living things but I did not >say that it was caused by mutations. See above, SNPs provide a basis rapid changes occur with gene conversion and recombination. > That would not be reasonable. The >changes are built into the life form's original designs. That is the >only reasonable explanation Wrong, unless Noah personally carried people from mt. ararat to south america, dropped them off and came back (not to mention hugely erroneous timing). > if you think about it. Obviously you haven't thought about it because you are wrong. Other examples of genetic change that has been beneficial: 1. Reduction of glutin Upper GI susceptibility in agrarian societies that grow wheat, persistence of susceptibility in agrarian societies that do not. 2. Reduction in type II diabetes in societies where fat and carbohydrate abundance were cyclical. 3. Lactose tolerance in milk consuming societies. West africa and northwestern europe. (results from an extension into adulthood the enzyme that allows lactose digestion) 4. Alcohol dehydrogenase and metabolism in societies where alcohol drinking traditions have developed. There are many changes in beneficial genes in humans that have occurred in the last few thousand years, most of these are based on genetic variants in place; however in the case of the HLA A,B,C types in south america 15,000 years ago these variants did not exist and came to exist as a result of nascent recombinant allelotypes and positive selection.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |