Re: For gen2rev. California Civil Code 1719(relaitng to bad checks)

raven1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 06:07:02 +0000 (UTC), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (J McCoy)
> wrote:
> 
> >AC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >> On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 23:25:27 +0000 (UTC), 
> >> J McCoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> 
> >Actually, Aaron Claussen,  I'm  tired of your despicable behavior of
> >trying to coerce me into paying on a debt that I DO NOT OWE.
> 
> 
> Then why did you admit that you do, McLiar?
> 
> http://groups.google.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> "No gen2rev.  I owe money to gen2rev so that's what I wrote the check
> out to. So where's your address gen2rev? IT is NOT A LIE."
> 
> 
> >
> >Please apologize for your slander.
> 
> You mean "libel", not "slander", McDumbass,

Getting nasty here?  Such anger, perhaps the result of my capable
refutation.  But let me restate the facts. None of these have been
dealt with, but merely snipped out and ignored.

First of all, the bet was specifically addressed to Dana Tweedy.  Read
the snippet of the actual bet and who it's addressed to:

> > >> > >> J McCoy wrote:
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > "Dana Tweedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > >> > >> > news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > >> > >> > > Alt atheism removed
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > >> > > You have made that claim before, but again you have never
> > >> > >> > > supported this lie.  Johansen did not fabricate a hoax. 
> > >> > >> > > Provide evidence of your claim, or be once again shown to be a
> > >> > >> > > liar.
> > >> > >> > >
> > >> > >> > If I can prove that Johansen went around in burial grounds at
> > >> > >> > night to look for a human pelvis would you pay me $150?
> > >> > >> >
> > >> > >> > I bet  you $150 that I can prove it to you.
> > >> > >>

Now Raven,  you and your kindred keep restating the fact that I made a
bet and that it was accepted.  It was accepted by Gen2rev, that is
without doubt.  But since anyone can jump into a conversation, ANYONE
can accept  abet.

A judge will look at that and say,  "You liar,  McCoy did not bet
Gen2rev, and the context shows that you keep snipping out his counter
arguments and repeat your accusations as if they mean anything."

Later  on, the judge will note that you, RAVEN,  have purposely
snipped out a lot, and didn't do a lot about it.  You take a later
quote out of context, stating that McCoy owes Gen2rev , but failed to
note that in that original context, McCoy  had already turned down the
bet but you've coerced him into paying.


JM