
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
David Iain Greig wrote:
> Arne Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Matt Giwer wrote:
>>
>>>Ron Jacobson wrote:
>>>
>>>>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>>>>Glenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>"Matt Giwer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>>>>>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>snip
>>>>>>Produce physical evidence of gas chambers. That has never been done.
>>>> Of course it has: the structures themselves, and the compounds which
>>>>the cyanide gas forms in the walls.
>>> What does a chemical reaction of unidentified cause have to do with the
>>> equipment needed
>>>to handle large quantities of cyanide?
>>
>>MUAHAHAA! Red herring, eh? Pathetic.
> Just another Standard Lie By Giwer. (I shall start numbering them.
> This is #2. #1 would be 'no physical evidence of gas chambers'.)
Lets see. You delete the newsgroup I participate in and then claim
> He's citing the self-proclaimed 'expert' Fred Leuchter.
which I have never done.
Why such a lie and then try to avoid the refutation of that lie?
--
Some Kennedy assassination information is still classified
as a matter of national security. If Oswald was a lone
assassin there is no matter of national security. Therefore
Oswald was not the only assassin.
-- The Iron Webmaster, 2927
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |