Re: Giwer: Re: seen evidence of Holocaust in museums?

Arne Vogel wrote:
> Matt Giwer wrote:

>>Ron Jacobson wrote:

>>>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>>>Glenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>>>>"Matt Giwer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>>>>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>snip

>>>>>Produce physical evidence of gas chambers. That has never been done.

>>>  Of course it has:  the structures themselves,  and the compounds which 
>>>the cyanide gas forms in the walls. 

>>      What does a chemical reaction of unidentified cause have to do with the 
>> equipment needed 
>>to handle large quantities of cyanide?

> MUAHAHAA! Red herring, eh? Pathetic.

>>>>Ok, let's assume there is no physical evidence of gas chambers.
>>>>So now what?

>>>  I believe that's an interesting question.  But even if the Nazis had 
>>>managed to completely destroy the Auschwitz gas chambers,  we would still 
>>>know what happened there.  As if the murder of more than a million people 
>>>in one small place,  could have been (hypothetically) denied,  just by
>>>destroying the murder machinery! 

>>      How can you claim to know anything without physical evidence? Are you psychic?

> HCN-caused compounds in walls is not physical evidence? Gee, what *is* 
> physical evidence? If forensic experts applied your standards, there 
> would have never been a single conviction.

        As you know HCN was the only pesticide used in the camps, why would you not 
expect to 
find it?

-- 
In 1992, Bush the First said, "If people were to ever find out what we
have, we would be chased down the streets and lynched." So, who is the
they? what did they do? and who has the rope?
        -- The Iron Webmaster, 2920