Re: seen evidence of Holocaust in museums?

Arne Vogel wrote:
> Matt Giwer wrote:
> 
>>John C. Randolph wrote:
>>
>>>Matt Giwer wrote:
>>
>>>>      When a story describes impossible things the story is false and the teller 
>>>> is a liar. It
>>>>is as simple as that.
>>
>>>That would be why people discount holocaust deniers like yourself and
>>>David Irving.  Seems there were a few too many TONS of paperwork
>>>presented at Nuremburg, not to mention the hundreds of thousands of
>>>eyewitnesses, including former guards, their officers, prisoners, and
>>>the allied troops who liberated the camps.

>>      Which as absolutely nothing to do with physical evidence of gas chambers.

> Let's face it: You only demand "physical evidence" because you believe 
> in a Zionist conspiracy to take over the world.

        You believe you possess a remarkable talent. Lets test it. What number am I 
thinking of?

>>>Give it up, adolf. 

>>      Can't be a joke, moshe?

>>>You lost the war because your beloved fuhrer turned
>>>out to be utterly incompetent as a military commander.  You're not going
>>>to get another shot at murdering all the Jews in the world.

> Yes, sending his troops to die in the Russian winter, and wasting 
> precious resources on the strategically useless V1 and V2 instead of air 
> defense. U-flak-boats and manned torpedoes weren't quite the hit either. 
> And if the Me 163 wasn't a joke (it produce some nice fireworks, 
> though)! Der Führer is always right?

        I find all of this concentration on Hitler so amusing for those who pretent a 
righteous 
anger. Did you folks never hear of Stalin? He murdered more people than Hitler is 
accused 
of murdering in just the winter Hitler came to power. He murdered some 40 million in 
his 
lifetime. Lenin got 10-12 million in his short rule. Most of those were for their 
religion. And Stalin was on the side of the angels as an ally against Hitler. And as a 
follow up in his post war career he enslaved eastern Europe, far more than Hitler ever 
got 
near, imposed his merciless system and his minions in those countries murdered tens of 
millions more.

        Talk about misplaced emphasis.

>>      What does that have to do with no evidence for gas chambers?

> No "physical" evidence, you mean.

        Same thing actually but a lot of people think story telling is evidence so I 
use both 
words to make it clear to them.

> Do you really think anyone is going to 
> accept your suggestion that you only question the evidence for gas 
> chambers,

        I do not question the evidence. I correctly observe there is no evidence. 
Those are quite 
different things.

> but don't deny the holocaust. Not after you called others "holohuggers".

        See Christmas in a previous response.

        I like using holohugger. I invented the word. I also invented izziehugger. I 
also 
invented the term fundie for fundamentalist back in the late 1980s and it is finally 
coming into common usage.

        The Globe and Mail incorrectly attributed holohugger to Ingrid Rimland a few 
years back. 
She will confirm I coined it.

-- 
The more Americans die in Iraq the better things are
in Iraq. I didn't know Bush smoked.
        -- The Iron Webmaster, 2913