Re: seen evidence of Holocaust in museums?

Seppo Pietikainen wrote:
> John C. Randolph wrote:
> 
>>Matt Giwer wrote:
>>
>>>John C. Randolph wrote:

>>>>Susan Cohen wrote:
>>>
>>>>>There isn't a single word that *can't* be abused by someone determined to
>>>>>abuse words.
>>>
>>>>They all want to be Goebbels, and they don't realize that the big lie
>>>>only works when you can lock up anyone who doesn't believe it.  Even
>>>>then, there were a lot of Germans who knew the nazis were full of shit,
>>>>and fought heroically behind the lines.
>>>
>>>       If you are correct with that description and inlight of disagreement with 
>>> the most
>>>airheaded holohuggers is criminal offense in France, Germany, and Poland (et al.) 
>>>is it
>>>not clear which is the big lie in need of protection of law? What kind of truth 
>>>needs
>>>protection?

>>Personally, I disagree with the european's policy of locking you up just
>>for lying about the holocaust, but since they suffered under hitler's
>>war and occupation, and they have no intention of letting you get
>>another shot at it, I'm not going to put too much effort into getting
>>any American nazi sprung when the polizei toss him in the drunk tank for
>>wearing a swastika.
>>
>>If you're such a fan of free speech, why are you a nazi?

> I don't mean to provide *any* charity to foul slime like "Matt Giwer", but
> free speech provides likes of him the *only* possibility to survive with
> their perversions.

        It is the only way to keep you folks honest.

> The sicko *needs* attention to survive, like that "helge" -whiner.

        I survive quite well, thank you. Creationists, holohuggers, psychics, 
astrologers, all 
the same to me.

-- 
With all the talk of Middle East peace no one seems
to notice no one in Palestine has the power to
negotiate the property rights of the refugees.
        -- The Iron Webmaster, 2928