Re: Social Darwinism; was: So Long Judge Moore, We'll Miss You

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ambrose searle) wrote:

> My preferred topic is American History. I was drawn into a discussion
> of Social Darwinism when I made the claim that much of what Darwin
> wrote has been rejected... which now seems to be the consensus of most
> of the posters in this thread; but Carol Lee Smith challenged the
> assertion. Now that everyone else is saying that it's a given, I've
> made my case.

Who's saying that? Some of what Darwin wrote is wrong. Some of what 
Einstein and Newton wrote was wrong, too. But they were wrong in the 
right way.

-- 
|                   Andrew Glasgow <amg39(at)cornell.edu>                   |
| "SCSI is *NOT* magic.  There are *fundamental technical reasons* why it   |
| is necessary to sacrifice a young goat to your SCSI chain now and then."  |
|                                                  -- John Woods            |