
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 21:13:57 +0000 (UTC), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David W. Robertson) wrote: >http://www.angelfire.com/ok3/dwr/d2.html > >The title of my essay is "Evolution: A Legoist Perspective". Note misspelling of "legoist" (legioist) in the second line. A theory based on Lego! I love it! Naturally, your first stumbling block around here will be your assumption that Gods exist. There is no direct evidence, that we know of, either for against the existence of Gods. You might want to make this, the acceptance of faith in Gods, the first Assertion. This is an extremely fundamental part of the Legoist's world view and it should be made known in a prominent fashion. Assertion 1: science is based on evaluating theories based on data. Assertion 2: a good one, but implicit in the evolutionist side of the argument. Scientists (pace atheists!) can neither confirm nor deny the existence of Gods. Scientists also know that the Theory of Evolution has nothing to do with Gods, even if there are Gods - it's all to do with the later development of the Gods' creation. Assertion 3: I don't think the evolutionists will disagree. Scientists (biologists in this case) like to work with observational and experimental data - dusty manuscripts aren't much use. Assertion 4: Fair enough. The legoists are clearly theists of some sort, though you make it sound too much like a Christian / monotheists only club - it is appropriate that they understand and state the understanding that their scientific understanding countermands their religious literature. Assertion 5: No arguments from me. A little too Bible-centric and way too Christianocentric - but then again, it's usually Christian fundamentalists and Christian Creationists that argue the creation point of view around here! For what it's worth, I don't think I'd call Legoism a "neutral" position. Personally, I agree with much of this - and I don't consider my own position "neutral". By accepting the standards and methods of Science (i.e., by accepting the reality of evolution and Theory of Evolution that explains it); ánd by believing in something beyond the mundane (Gods, if you will), the Legoist clearly plants one foot in both camps. Something that doesn't always sit well with either evolutionary atheists or creational religionists. Keep us apprised of your progress! Padraic. la cieurgeourea provoer mal trasfu ast meiyoer ke 'l andrext ben trasfu.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |