Re: Social Darwinism; was: So Long Judge Moore, We'll Miss You

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (ambrose searle) wrote:
>Darwin could not have observed "bible belt fundamentalists" for
>several reasons, but most obvious is that "Fundamentalism" wasn't even
>born until 1910 (http://religiousmovements.lib.virginia.edu/nrms/fund.html)

By that logic, Darwin couldn't have been a "social darwinist", because
the term was not used until 1887.

lojbab
-- 
lojbab                                             [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban:                 http://www.lojban.org