Re: Mike Painter's recent post flatly contracts yet another one of Stockwell's bald claims

A Pagano wrote:

> And yet another bald claim by Stockwell.  Stockwell writes above,
> ".....emphatically points in the direction that it is impossible for
> life to be the result of intelligent design."  How exactly does
> Stockwell know this since "intelligent design" has not been seriously
> considered by the secular community for at least a century?
 
How does Tony know otherwise? What is a "secular community"? How does
Tony know anything since he claims naturalism is false?

***************************************************************
Elmer Bataitis              “Hot dog! Smooch city here I come!”
Planetech Services                                       -Hobbes
585-442-2884   
"...proudly wearing and displaying, as a badge of honor, the 
straight jacket of conventional thought."                          
***************************************************************