www.Usenet.com

Talk Thread Archive from Usenet.com

Re: Literal Bible Translations are specious

>Richard Uhrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :



>What did they read literally?
>

The foreword and acknowledgements?

--irascible since 1957

Literal Bible Translations are specious, fencingsax
- Re: Literal Bible Translations are specious, Mike Goodrich
- Re: Literal Bible Translations are specious, Louann Miller
  - Re: Literal Bible Translations are specious, John Wilkins
    - Re: Literal Bible Translations are specious, Richard Uhrich
      - Re: Literal Bible Translations are specious, John Wilkins
        
        Re: Literal Bible Translations are specious, Matt Silberstein
        
        Re: Literal Bible Translations are specious, TomS
        
        Re: Literal Bible Translations are specious, Richard Uhrich
      - Re: Literal Bible Translations are specious, Tim Norfolk
  - Re: Literal Bible Translations are specious, Jack Crenshaw
  - Re: Literal Bible Translations are specious, John Thomas Grisham
    - Re: Literal Bible Translations are specious, John Thomas Grisham
- Re: Literal Bible Translations are specious, fencingsax
  - Re: Literal Bible Translations are specious, C. Thompson
- Re: Literal Bible Translations are specious, Not-easily-duped
  - Re: Literal Bible Translations are specious, Earle Jones
    - Re: Literal Bible Translations are specious, Not-easily-duped

<-- __Thread__ -->

Please check out one of the Premium USENET Services below: