
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"K Dog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > I'll ask one question, Kito, do you support abortion? > > If so, then naturally you'd support euthanasia for a human who wants to end > their lives. > > Abortion is morally inferior to euthanasia because with abortion the human > doesn't get a choice but with euthanasia the human does get a choice. > > It seems funny like that hey...one act of killing robs the child of a choice > and is perfectly legal but the other act allows the other person a choice > but is illegal. Strange that hey. Key word => CONTROL. > > It's all about controlling the lives of others, whether that be through > abortion or through making dignified death illegal...either way right hey? > > KD > > > Kito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > We regard it humane however, > > > to end an animalīs life if it is suffering from age, a disease or an > > > injury which is not cureable, for human beings this is not the case. > > > > What seems to be the standard reply for pro-euthansia proponents is > > this very sentence. How can one even begin to compare the life of a > > dog/cat to that of a human being. We regard a person who kills people > > as a murderer, pure and simple regardless of how it happened, if you > > kill a person you're by definition a murderer. However if you kill a > > cow or a chicken, then you're not a murderer you're called a butcher. > > Butchers don't go to jail, they don't become shuned by society. This > > already shows that we treat the life of animals and the life of a > > human being completely different. Therefore it isn't practical and > > logical or even sane to compare the life of a dog and cat to that of a > > life of a human being. euthanasia and abortion are completely different and shouldn't be compared ever as i agree with the above euthanasia is a choice
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |