
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Phil Calvert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "tinydancer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > "Robert Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Well, then, you either have no idea what you're talking about or you're a > > > moron. The Schindlers are the only people in this case who have brought > > > raftloads of lies to court, and having them fail there, shot them into PR > > > spin. If you can point out one lie that Michael Schiavo's told and been > > > called on by anybody who isn't named Schindler, please do. > > > > > > > > Can you cite any rehabilitation Terri has received *after* the award was > > made for her *supposed rehabilitation*. > > Here's another article I haven't seen mentioned yet in this thread: > http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/306hhsrh.a sp > > According to the author, Wesley J. Smith: > > "The only efforts ever undertaken to improve Terri's condition took > place in 1990 and 1991. They had ceased by the time of the malpractice > trial in 1992 because her insurance coverage had run out. Indeed, the > pressing need to restart therapy was an urgent part of the malpractice > case. It could have--and should have--paid to restart the > rehabilitation that had been abandoned due to lack of funds. > > Once Terri's $750,000 was in the bank, however, Schiavo would not > approve a single cent of it to be spent on rehabilitation." Thanks, this is the exact point I was trying to make. Teri received no rehabilitation once the award was made and the amount of the award was made taking the cost of rehabilitation into account. td
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |