
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (michael price) wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Phil Calvert) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gerald Lichtcsien) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > > Sounds like the battle of the bullheads. > > > Phil, thanks for posting the report. > > > But --- something is missing. Removal of a feeding tube does not mean > > > the patient is forbidden sustenance. > > > Is there another side of this octagon? > > > > Gerald, > > > > Your bewilderment is understandable. The desire not to be kept alive > > by artificial means is not the same as a desire not to live at all. > > Nevertheless, Judge Greer ordered that no one is allowed to try to > > feed Terri. In fact, there are two policemen guarding her to make > > sure that no one does. Judge Greer wouldn't even allow a trial period > > of therapy and rehabilitation to see if it would be possible for Terri > > to be spoon fed. In other words, her husband, his lawyers, and the > > judge are intent on killing her. > > She's been dead for years. ... € Brain dead? -- € R.L. Measures, 805-386-3734, www.somis.org. + in adr = spam trap
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |