
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gerald Lichtcsien) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > Sounds like the battle of the bullheads. > Phil, thanks for posting the report. > But --- something is missing. Removal of a feeding tube does not mean > the patient is forbidden sustenance. > Is there another side of this octagon? Gerald, Your bewilderment is understandable. The desire not to be kept alive by artificial means is not the same as a desire not to live at all. Nevertheless, Judge Greer ordered that no one is allowed to try to feed Terri. In fact, there are two policemen guarding her to make sure that no one does. Judge Greer wouldn't even allow a trial period of therapy and rehabilitation to see if it would be possible for Terri to be spoon fed. In other words, her husband, his lawyers, and the judge are intent on killing her. For more information on this case, see this web site: http://www.terrisfight.org/ For some quick insight into why her husband might want her dead, be sure to read the following two letters that were recently sent to Jeb Bush: http://www.terrisfight.org/downloads/More.pdf http://www.terrisfight.org/downloads/Supplemental%20More.pdf Phil
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |