www.Usenet.com
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
http://members.aol.com/colonelyu1/index.htm
http://members.aol.com/alanyu5/index.htm
Why US military can neither find Bin Laden , nor Saddam Hussein after US
military have already removed Saddam Hussein's regime?
The only logical reason is that there are problems in USA intelligence
agencies. Thus, they have difficulties to find Bin Laden and Saddam
Hussein. What is their real problem?
I believe that the real problem is that US invisible personnel did not
join this war against terrorists. Thus, they did not try to use their
world's network intelligence to locate Bin Laden and Saddam Hussein.
What is the invisibility technology? According to inside information from
former
Taiwan President Chiang Kai-Shek, the invisibility technology of Philadelphia
Experiment has been developed successfully to use on human after WWII by
US Navy. After using invisibility technology on the personnel and their
equipment, they will become invisible, tiny and can levitate. The tiny
invisible personnel and weapon are unsuitable for military use, it has been
transferred
for use in surveillance system. In 1950s, this invisibility technology was
transferred to Taiwan's surveillance system. Based on the levitated ability
of invisibility technology and wearing a propulsion device on back, every
invisible personnel can move as a flying ant (equipped with weapons & mind
machine). Thus, the invisible personnel can gently fly onto a victim's head
to read one's mind and mind control him without the victim's knowledge. Also,
they can gently land on a target's body (near any organ) to induce
illness/death without most victims' knowledge (But so far, they still cannot
explain why
humans become tiny in the electromagnetic field).
The unlawful life control surveillance system's establishment is based on
atheism, materialism & communism. Why? I would use Taiwan as an example to
explain it in details. Chiang Ching-Kuo was the head of Taiwan intelligence
agencies and internal security in 1950s. As a former communist (during his days
in Soviet Unions), Chiang Ching-Kuo still clung on to its'
atheistic and materialistic beliefs. It means he believed that human is purely
composed of materials without soul and God doesn't exist. So, the concept of
reward and punishment after death for one's deeds in the life would not be a
factor in his decision. His communistic and atheistic belief caused him to
regard people's lives as properties and in the communist ideology, the
properties do not belong to individuals and can be distributed. Thus, when
pursuing invisible personnel's unlawful interest, these invisible personnel
would toy with anyone's health and kill anyone. As an atheist with considerable
power, Chiang Ching-Kuo would not have any problem about doing something bad
if he felt he could get away with it in life. So, he used invisible personnel
in conjunction with psychotronic weapons and illness/death inducing techniques
to create an unlawful life control surveillance system in Taiwan in the 1950s.
Also, Chiang Ching-Kuo believed that the people need to spy on each other
(like in communist society) to secure everything and avoid unlawful life
control from being exposed. Thus, his invisible operatives also recruited
operatives and collaborators from every walk of life (e.g. Banking system,
hospital system, Justice/court system, education system, transportation
system, business, finance & insurance system, food market, hotel/restaurants,
all religions, many different media, psychics, psychiatric institutions,
etc.) in order to mind/life control anyone.
Chiang Ching-Kuo kept the secret of unlawful life control and invisibility
technology from all other public officials (including the President Chiang
Kai-Shek, etc.). The only other people on Taiwan who knew of it were the
invisible personnel themselves and those officials directly involved with
them. President Chiang Kai-Shek only became aware of invisibility technology
because of a loyal intelligence agent who secretly notified him of it after
the invisible personnel injured his knee (see details on Part II-A of my
website). According to Taiwan's inside information, a rule in their secret
agreement is that these invisible personnel belong to a secret international
organization. Any country's invisible personnel would be considered as other
invisible personnel's blood brothers/sisters (This is just like the members
of a criminal organization. They will swear an oath to be each other's blood
brothers/sisters ). So, in the invisible personnel's mind, they no longer
treat their blood relatives as family anymore. Furthermore, these
relatives will be only considered as their life/mind control targets.
When pursuing the invisible personnel's unlawful interests, they would
betray their blood relatives (e.g. Chiang Kai-Shek was injured by the
invisible operatives of Chiang Ching-Kuo). Also, there is no national
border between invisible personnel because the international invisible
personnel group's members include all invisible personnel around the world.
So, they do not believe themselves belong to any country. Thus,
they are not loyal to the country, nor to their normal relatives. When
pursuing their unlawful interests, they would betray their country (see
staged car accident case on http://members.aol.com/alanyu5/part3a1.htm ).
Since the unlawful life control surveillance system in Taiwan was
secretive and evil, it would most likely also be secretive and evil in US
and other countries because these invisible personnel is a secret
international group and there is no national border between them (see
http://members.aol.com/alanyu5/part3a1.htm ).
US involved local police and FBI agents have used invisibility technology
and non-lethal weapon on Americans for many years (see details on .
http://members.aol.com/alanyu5/part1b1.htm ).
Thus, the invisibility technology is neither used for national security
purpose (investigating spy and anti-terrorism), nor used to control crimes
(see http://members.aol.com/alanyu5/part2e1.htm ). It is mainly used for
unlawful life control to advance their own unlawful interests/power against
their governments (see details on http://members.aol.com/alanyu5/part3a1.htm ,
or
http://members.aol.com/colonelyu1/part3a1.htm ).
For example, Edward Lee Howard, a former CIA Agent Who Defected to Soviet
Unions in
1985. According to the report by Cox Washington Bureau (08-18-02), "On Sept.
20, 1985,
FBI agents interviewed Howard and put him under surveillance. With his wife's
help, however,
he ditched the tail and fled the country on Sept. 21 on a flight bound for
Helsinki. According to
Russian sources, however, the 'spy who got away' traveled repeatedly to the
United States after
his defection without the CIA or FBI's knowledge."
This incident proves that invisibility technology was not used by the FBI
agents to investigate spy case when Edward Howard was put under surveillance.
Otherwise, the tiny invisible personnel would fly onto the Howard's head
and stay on his head wherever he goes. Then, Howard's wife certainly could
not help Howard to ditch the FBI agents and fled to Moscow. This traitor
had also traveled repeatedly back into the US without CIA and FBI's
knowledge. Obviously, after Edward Howard became a traitor, he should
be a "most wanted" person. Since the life control surveillance network
gives the invisible personnel "total awareness" on important persons'
movements into the country, the invisible personnel had to know that
Howard sneaked back into the US repeatedly. Yet, they never alerted FBI to
arrest Howard. This proves that the invisibility technology is only used
by involved agents and police (invisible personnel) to advance unlawful
life control on Americans (see http://members.aol.com/alanyu5/part1b1.htm ).
It shows that keeping spies under close surveillance and capturing them
are obviously not the invisible personnel's concern and business.
Since the invisible personnel did not work for National Security purpose,
former CIA senior agent Ames Aldrich could have worked for KGB over ten
years. Also, former FBI agent Robert Hanssen could have worked for KGB over
twenty years. Until the above two spies had been captured, US invisible
personnel (involved agents/police and recruited operatives) did not have
any contribution on these spy cases.
The following information prove that USA intelligence agencies did have
problem in recent ten years. So, they can neither find WMD in Iraq, nor can
find Saddam Hussein.
The following two information from "Meet the Press" prove that Iraq has
WMD was the consensus of both Democratic & Republican Leaders (from
Clinton administration to Bush administration) before war. The fact proves
that this consensus (Iraq has WMD) must be derived from intelligence
agencies' reports but not from President Bush (especially in Clinton
administration). So, if Iraq's WMD does not exist or cannot be found, it
is the fault of intelligence agencies.
1. The following information from Meet the Press (on 9/28/03) proves that
Democratic Presidential Candidate REP. GEPHARDT (who was Democrats leader in
House) also believed that WMD existing in Iraq and supported President Bush
on the war. Did President Bush misled him? NO! Absolutely not and he
clearly explain the real reasons to Tim Russert.
REP. GEPHARDT: Tim, I didn’t just take the president’s word for
this. I went out to the CIA three times. I talked to George Tenet
personally. I talked to his top people. I talked to people that had been in
the Clinton administration in their security effort. And I became
convinced, from that, all of that, that he either had weapons of mass
destruction or he had components of weapons or he had the ability to
quickly make a lot of them and pass them to terrorists.
Look, after 9/11, we’re in a world, in my view, that we have to
protect the American people from further acts of terrorism. That’s my
highest responsibility, that’s the Congress’ highest responsibility, and
the president. And I did what I thought was the right thing to do to
protect our people from further acts of terrorism. We cannot have that
happen in the United States, and I will always do that.
(Source)- Meet the Press
==============
Transcript for September 28, 2003
MR. RUSSERT: And we are back. Congressman Gephardt,
welcome back to MEET THE PRESS.
REP. DICK GEPHARDT, (D-MO): Good to be here.
MR. RUSSERT: Let’s go back to October 2, 2002. You were the
leader of the Democrats in the House. You supported the president on
the war, voted for a resolution to give him the authority, appeared with
him in the Rose Garden and said this to the American people. Let’s
watch:
(Videotape, October 2, 2002):
REP. GEPHARDT: In our view, Iraq’s use and continuing
development of weapons of mass destruction, combined with efforts of
terrorists to acquire such weapons pose a unique and dangerous threat
to our national security.
(End videotape)
MR. RUSSERT: A unique and dangerous threat. We have not
found any such weapons. Were you wrong or misled?
REP. GEPHARDT: Tim, I didn’t just take the president’s word for
this. I went out to the CIA three times. I talked to George Tenet
personally. I talked to his top people. I talked to people that had been in
the Clinton administration in their security effort. And I became
convinced, from that, all of that, that he either had weapons of mass
destruction or he had components of weapons or he had the ability to
quickly make a lot of them and pass them to terrorists.
Look, after 9/11, we’re in a world, in my view, that we have to
protect the American people from further acts of terrorism. That’s my
highest responsibility, that’s the Congress’ highest responsibility, and
the president. And I did what I thought was the right thing to do to
protect our people from further acts of terrorism. We cannot have that
happen in the United States, and I will always do that.
MR. RUSSERT: But what happened to the weapons of mass
destruction? What should be done now to find out why the intelligence
was misleading or just plain wrong?
REP. GEPHARDT: Obviously, Tim, we need a blue-ribbon
commission. If there hasn’t been one before I’m president, when I’m
president, we will have one. The American people have to understand
and believe that the information they’re getting from their government
is credible, is true. And if there was a failure of intelligence, we’ve got
to have more than just the intelligence committees look at it. We’ve got
to have a blue-ribbon commission. We’ve got to get to the bottom of it.
==
2. The following information proves that Clinton Administration and Bush
Administration have a consensus about WMD existing in Iraq. So, if
WMD cannot be found in Iraq, it is the fault of intelligence agencies.
Albright ‘Surprised’ at Failure To Find WMD (She believes Iraq had a WMD
program)
Posted by areafiftyone
On 09/22/2003 6:24 AM PDT with 3 comments
NY Sun ^ | 9/22/03
The Bush administration got a boost from an unexpected quarter
yesterday when President Clinton’s secretary of state, Madeleine
Albright, said she was surprised that weapons of mass destruction had
not been discovered in Iraq. Mrs. Albright, who would have been privy
to intelligence similar to that which President Bush used in making the
decision to invade Iraq, appeared on NBC’s Meet the Press program
yesterday. She was asked whether she was surprised American troops
had not found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. I am surprised,
she said. I think part of the problem here is that, as I understand...
=====
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
