Re: 17,000 deaths a year from the cold

"Ian St. John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Listen George. Until you find actual physical evidence that is evaluated
by
> trained legal and forensic people, you are blowing wind out your anus.
>
> ---------------- What is known ( fairy well established at least ) ------
>
> Both Iran and Iraq used chemical agents in their conflict.
>
> Chemical weapons do not 'point fingers' back at the originators so some
> conflicts have little evidence as to which side used them. There are some
> other incidents where it was clearly Iran or clearly Iraq.

You obviously have not heard of chemical fingerprinting, a very common test
to determine the origin/manufacturer of a chemical.  You are such a dork!

> The origin of the materials for chemical and biological weapons was often
> the U.S. which backed the Iraqis in their war as a check on the power of
> Islamic Iranian Fundamentalists.

And Belgium, and Germany, etc, etc, etc.  Your point is?  You said above
that "Chemical weapons do not 'point fingers' back at the originators so
some
conflicts have little evidence as to which side used them."  I say they can
easily be traced.  and Yet you have no problem pointing the finger at the US
for providing chemical precursers despite the fact that you have no evidence
whatsoever that Iraq actually used those provided chemicals to make the
weapons in question.

> The Geneva Convention ( to which both are a signatory ) prohibits the use
of
> Chemical or Biological weapons but the fact is that both Iran, Iraq, and
the
> U.S. thumb their noses at the convention whenever they like. The real
> recourse for the convention is that once one side uses them, the other is
> free to do so.

Using that seriously fucked up reasoning, its ok to pollute Canadian waters
with our pollution because they are doing it to us.  Your argument is flawed
kimosabi.

> There were approximately 375,000 war dead on the Iraqi sides so until you
> have accounted for those 375,000 casualties you have no 'excess' of mass
> burials.

You are a tea-totally idiot.  You must really get your jollies off sucking
all that wahhabi dick.