Re: Sunspots...

Stuart Grey wrote:

> fãhç wrote:
>
> > "Stuart Grey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Here's the data.  You are wrong.  Case closed.
> >
> > http://www.pmodwrc.ch/pics/comp_d19_vg.gif
>
>
> LOL! That's just solar irradiance data, you
> stupid dip shit. You are not a very good commiecrat
> propagandist, are you? I've worked with much better
> commiecrats.
>
> Here's how a better commiecrat would have handled
> it...
>
> They would point to the graph that shows over the
> last 10 years how the global temperature is diverging
> from following the solar cycle, and following the
> CO2 levels.
>
> Then I come back and point to the corrected data,
> that eliminates the surface data points gathered by
> areas that have become urbanized over the last
> ten years, show how with this correction it follows
> the air temperature data and past data for as far
> back as studies can determine so it's correct, and then
> I show how  that again follows solar cycle - (NOT
> just irradiance).
>
> That's when you throw you hands up and point to the
> latest commiecrat lie - the one where all the bad
> temperature data is included and a lot of statistical
> hand waving is done to reach the commiecrat conclusion.
>
> Then I laugh at how pathetic that is, point to the bad
> data, and you slink away for another forum where there
> are not people as well informed as I.

Your use of "commiecrat" instantly marks you as a kook and your use of 
pseudoscience confirms it.