Re: Global warming increases chance of wild weather BULLSHIT!!!

Oh really? Then care to explain just WHY it says that there is a "flaw
in the process that is used to judge Global Warming that if proven
would cut the "evidence" of same by half"

Sounds like cooking the books to me and anyone else with any brain
cells. So if anyone is a liar or scientifically illiterate, it is
clearly the man you see in the bathroom mirror every morning

You global warming nutcases were captured screwing with the numbers
and it was posted world wide. Spin it anyway you want to try, but this
proves that you GW nutcases are nothing more then liars.


On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 00:10:52 -0700, John Starrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>Tazmanian Devil wrote:
>> nature magazine has printed a very nice story proving that you lying
>> global warming nutcases have "cooked the books" and have doubled your
>> "facts" to make everything look worse then it is.
>> http://www.nature.com
>> 
>> In short, you have no data to back you up as if you have to "cook the
>> books" to get what you want, then how can we believe anything you say
>> is a fact in this case?!
><snip>
>
>
>http://www.nature.com/nsu/031124/031124-10.html
>
>
>That's not what the article says at all. You are a liar, or you are 
>scientifically illiterate.
>
>John Starrett