
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Ian St. John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > "James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > "George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <snip> > > > > Clue: Someone is going to profit. be it Hariburton, Bechtel, or > > another. > > > > It will be at the expense of the American people regardless. > > > > > > > > > > Not to defend Bush (I never voted for him) but as I understand it > > Haliburton > > > was the company that had experience in this sort of thing. Others had > the > > > capacity but not the experience. > > > > > > > Actually, Bechtel has both as well. > > The point was that the war was bound to benefit these companies in > particular which is why they lobbied for them. The fact that they then > become the 'logical parties' to run the oil and rebuilding is not relevant > to anything. The only point about that is the restriction of the contracts > to U.S. corporations that can then make profits from their ties to the > occupation command, kind of a left hand, right hand thing. I.E. no 'arms > length' negotiations, but merely American military forces taking Iraqi > assets and selling them to American companies at bargain basement prices, > along with Iraqi monetary assets being give for the 'reconstruction' to pay > for the sales. > > If you had been paying attention in the last few weeks, then you'd know that the bid process has been opened up. Wanna send in your bid? I can provide you with an address. I'll even buy your plane ticket.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |