
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Economic Democracy) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > [This only made page 11 (!!) of the Washington Post!] > > Sciences report has concluded that greenhouse gases and other > pollutants could trigger large, abrupt and potentially disastrous > climate changes.c Read the last four words. The whole article has this tone, but those four words reveal it all. The generic reader of the Washington Post has, over the last few decades, seen and read an untold number of reports promising all sorts of abrupt, large, disastrous COULD HAPPENs that never happen. A recollection of a story about crying "wolf" repeatedly crosses my mind... Now, while you and I are likely satisfied with the accuracy of the report and the science behind it, it doesn't change the fact that the scientific community has miniscule credibility when it comes to predicting large scale things happening fast. And of course, there is the other problem, the REAL problem that makes policy people ignore these things. No one in the scientific community can belly up to the table and say IF you make reduction ABC, these consequences WILL NOT happen. They don't do it, because in all honesty, they can't prove that their suggested proposals will stop the effect. We all know what is causing global warming, on the other hand, no one can prove that it can now be halted. I tend to be one of those that believes the effect has already passed the point of being self-propagating. Take all the human contribution out, and I'd bet good money that the effect would only marginally slow. Granted, its a meaningless bet, but it expresses my point well enough.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |