Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Talk Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: Sunspots...



"Stuart Grey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> fãhç wrote:
>
> > "Stuart Grey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>The hope is to convince ignorant people that
> >>the global temperature rise is due to man
> >>made CO2, not due to solar activity, so they
> >>can shut down capitalism and the commie rat
> >>bastards can control the world.
> >
> >
> > Opponents like to claim that global warming models can not be accurate
> > (even
> > though the models closely approximate known historical data) because
> > weather, and supposedly climate, are too chaotic to predict.
>
> You don't know shit about science, asshole.
>
> If it doesn't predict, it's damn worthless as a model.
> If the model does NOT describe the system, it's a bad
> model.

And the model accurately predicts the climate changes.  Apparently everyone
but you can see the correlation between real and modeled climate data in
this report...
http://www.unep.ch/ipcc/pub/spm22-01.pdf

> >  Opponents also
> > claim that reducing greenhouse gas emissions will cause economic chaos.
> > What do they base this on?  Economic computer models!
>
> What a dumbshit you are. Our models of the economy are
> much better than the models that you commiecrats fabricate,

Hahahahaha!  Talk about dumbshits.  Nobody can predict with any accuracy
what is going to happen next in the stock market or the economy.  This is
proven every single day.  A monkey throwing feces at the Wall Street Journal
could pick stocks that perform just as well as the most highly acclaimed
analyst.


> because the economist who make the models of the economy
> don't start with the conclusion that global warming will
> destroy the earth, and then work back to make a model that
> predicts this. A scientist starts out with an unbiased
> outlook, and makes the model and then TESTS the model.


> Every test of the commiecrat model has FAILED to predict.
> The last model had us dead by now. It didn't happen.

Really?  Then how do you explain the accurate of the model data to real data
in this report?
http://www.unep.ch/ipcc/pub/spm22-01.pdf

> > If anyone could
> > possibly product an accurate economic model I'd like to see it so I
> > could make a few billion off the stock market.
>
> LOL! The economic projections are well known, and
> guys like Greenspan at the federal reserve run them
> and then make after market reports.

Right, everybody loved Greenspan and thought he was a genius when the
economy was doing well.  As soon as it turned sour, everyone hated him and
complained he didn't know what he was doing.  You have a selective memory.
The Federal Reserve's manipulation of the markets is just one more random
factor that adds to the chaos.

Anyone that thinks they can possibly gather and analyze enough data from all
companies, markets, world events, governments,  the daily thoughts of stock
traders, CEOs, CFOs, salespeople, etc. to predict the future of the economy
for more than the end of a quarter is completely delusional.

Someone who thinks they could gather all that data and then predict the
economic outcome of a world-wide policy changes is completely insane.

The climate models shown in this report are far more accurate than any
economic models, let alone economic predictions of policy changes.

http://www.unep.ch/ipcc/pub/spm22-01.pdf

> < snip commiecrat gibber and propaganda. >
>
> This is getting old.

Yes, your lack of any evidence and paranoid shrieking about communist plots
got old back in the 1950's during the McCarthy era (a hero of yours, no
doubt).

Next.






<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.