
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Thanks, Fred B. McGalliard... I think he's waging a one man battle, but then on some level or another, everyone does now and then about this or that. It's a minefield of mental illness here in www post-ville. Peace to you, Marc > "Marc Mulay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Fred... > > Statements like; "California, which is preparing to pave over its most > > fertile cropland...", give one the impression that you are a paranoid > > shut-in with a pyschiatric disorder of some kind. > > I have driven over California's most fertile croplands a number of times in > a number of different directions. California has already plowed under (not > paved over) the Owens valley to suck up the water for LA, but this happened > around 40 years ago at least. Most of the rest of the fertile crop land is > so vast that you would find it hard to dig up enough pavement to pave even a > significant part of it, so dry you would only have to pump the water down to > ravenous LA to destroy it, and in any case, is not even close to any city of > any size (does the name weed ring a bell?), so what on earth would you pave > it for? This kind of comment would have applied to the region of Kent, south > of Seattle, perhaps 30 years ago, but today the paving is mostly finished > and all the farms moved out to the desert. It turns out to be easier to turn > desert into fertile cropland far from the city, if you have water, than to > hang on in the face of the strong demand for decent housing. So I agree > Marc, this statement by the other Fred does sound a bit off kilter.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |